Siqueiros v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that cross-examination of the State's identifying witnesses can raise the issue of identity
• recognizing that cross-examination of the State’s identifying witnesses can raise the issue of identity
• holding evidence of extraneous offense improperly admitted in state's case-in-chief rendered harmless when evidence subsequently became relevant on issue of identity
• standing for the proposition that the erroneous admission of evidence can be cured by the subsequent admission of countervailing evidence
• recognizing cross-examination of State’s witnesses can raise issue of identity
• “Lastly, where an extraneous offense may have been improperly admitted in the State’s case-in-chief, subsequently admitted evidence can render the error harmless.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).