SIPUS

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting “defendant’s contention that her conducts which violated section 240.30(1),] qualifie[d] as constitutionally protected speech”
• rejecting “defendant’s contention that her conduct!, which violated section 240.30(1),] qualifiefd] as constitutionally protected speech”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).