Sipplen v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that there was no error for a trial court to deny a request for sanctions when there remained an open question as to the status of the law in that case
• recognizing an “officer may be liable for the torts that he personally commits, inspires, or participates in, even though performed in the name of the corporation.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).