Sipp v. Astrue

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reviewing the distinct court’s ruling on a Rule 59(e) motion for an abuse of discretion
• de novo review of dismissal for lack of subject matter jurisdiction based on failure to exhaust administrative remedies
• district court lacked jurisdiction to consider claimant’s challenge to Commissioner’s overpayment determination when there was no judicially reviewable “final decision” under section 405(g)
• “The administrative exhaustion requirement can however be excused, either by consent of the commissioner or in exceptional circumstances by the court.”
• applying 20 C.F.R. §§ 404.907

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).