Skip to main content
· 4/26/1994

Sipco, Inc. v. Director of Revenue

Citations

  • 875 S.W.2d 539
  • 1994 Mo. LEXIS 37
  • 1994 WL 145437

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • King implied that the holder of goods must show a calculated cost specifically factored into the price for resale to claim the resale exemption, but Sipco held this specific calculation was no longer necessary
  • customers received outright title to the dry ice packaged in pork shipments and used to preserve the pork
  • King implied that the holder of goods must show a calculated cost specifically factored into the price for resale to claim the resale exemption, but Sipco held this specific calculation was no longer necessary
  • dry ice used to preserve pork in shipments to customers was exempt from use tax as it was resold in that the value of the dry ice was factored directly or indirectly into the total consideration paid for the pork
  • dry ice used in packaging meat shipments

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Price

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.