Sioux, Ltd. v. Coopers & Lybrand

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that review of a district court’s decisions regarding admissibility of scientific expert testimony is under a clearly erroneous standard
• holding that the Frye test and the Federal Rules can co-exist
• admissibility of opinion that colon cancer was caused by long-time exposure to chemicals in battery factory where plaintiff was employed
• “we review the trial court’s evidentiary rulings, which define the summary judgment record, and we give these rulings their due deference”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).