Skip to main content
· 6/20/1932

Sioux City Stock Yards Co. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Citations

  • 59 F.2d 944
  • 5 U.S. Tax Cas. (CCH) 1448
  • 11 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 634
  • 1932 U.S. App. LEXIS 3500

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that, where an officer falsely promised immunity in exchange for the defendant’s consent to search his RV, the “quid pro quo was apparent,” and the defendant’s “capacity for self-determination was critically impaired” such that his consent was not voluntary
  • explaining that a confession induced by a promise of leniency is involuntary and thus unconsti- tutional
  • explaining that a confession induced by a promise of leniency is involuntary and thus unconsti- tutional

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gardner, Stone

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.