Skip to main content
· 3/14/1902

Sinsheimer v. Hartman

Citations

  • 19 Pa. Super. 494
  • 1902 Pa. Super. LEXIS 137

Syllabus

<p>Barlm,ersKyp-^Evidenoe^--Dealarations of mercantile agency/.</p> <p>In an action against, a partnership where; the main question is, whether-one, of the defendants was; a. partner, or held hims.eif out, as snoh, it, is inadmissible to show that such defendant had made declarations to a mercantile agency, that he was not a member of the partnership, but a creditor of it, there being no offer to prove that the plaintiffs had notice or knowledge of this statement, or that they were members of the mercantile agency.</p>

Judges: Beaver, Orlady, Porter, Qeeaev, Rice

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.