Sinor v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that borrowers were entitled to rescind within three years where a creditor’s form omitted the expiration date, although it stated that the rescission right expired three business days after July 16
• explaining that reasonable hourly rate must be based on “cus- tomary fees in cases of like difficulty”
• noting also that “[t]o insure that the consumer is protected ... [TILA and its implementing regulations must] be absolutely complied with and strictly enforced”
• “Technical or minor violations of TILA or Reg Z, as well as major violations, impose liability on the creditor and entitle the borrower to rescind.”
• “Technical or minor violations of TILA or Reg Z, as well as major violations, impose liability on the creditor and entitle the borrower to rescind.”
• “If the lending institution omits the expiration date . . . the borrower may rescind the loan within three years after it was consummat- ed.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).