Skip to main content
· 3/17/1972

Sinnett v. Albert

Citations

  • 195 N.W.2d 506
  • 188 Neb. 176
  • 1972 Neb. LEXIS 771

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • judicial statements privilege protects contents of attorney ethics com plaint so as to bar subsequent suit against complainant for libel
  • judicial statements privilege protects contents of attorney ethics complaint so as to bar subsequent suit against complainant for libel
  • statements made preliminary to judicial proceeding are absolutely privileged

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: White, Spencer, Boslaugh, McCown, Newton, Clinton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.