Sini v. Citibank, N.A.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• denying the plaintiffs’ motion to amend their Section 1983 complaint to add individual defendants where claims against the individual defendants would be time-barred, even where the plaintiff “was required to name an individual as a defendant”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).