Skip to main content
· 3/5/1894

Singluff v. Tindal

Citations

  • 40 S.C. 504
  • 19 S.E. 137
  • 1894 S.C. LEXIS 175

Syllabus

<p>1, Married woman — Promissory Note. — A promissory note is not a “like formal instrument,” within the meaning of the act of 1887 (19 Stat., 819), which declares that “all conveyances, mortgages, and like formal instruments of writing, affecting her separate estate, executed by a married woman, shall be effectual to convey or charge her separate estate, whenever the intention so to convey or charge such separate estate is declared m such conveyances, mortgages, or other instruments of writing.” And a married woman is not liable on her note given in payment of her husband’s debt, notwithstanding the declaration therein written, “that it is my purpose and intention, in making this note, to charge my separate property with payment of the same.”</p> <p>2. Oasis Criticised. — Martin v. Súber, 39 S. 0., 525, approved and followed.</p>

Judges: McIveb

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.