Singleton v. State
Citations
- 38 Fla. 297
Syllabus
<p>1. The twelfth section of Article IV of the Constitution of 1885 conferred power upon the Governor, Justices of the Supreme Court and Attorney-General, or a major part of them, of whom the Governor shall be one, to permanently remit fines and forfeitures, to commute punishment and grant pardons after conviction, in all cases except treason and impeachment,) subject to such regulations as may be prescribed by law relative to the manner of applying for pardons, and the pardoning power thus conferred is exclusive, and can not be exercised by the Legislature.</p> <p>.2. By the amendment of section 12, Article 4, adopted this year, the Secretary of State, Comptroller and Commissioner of Agriculture take the places of the Justices of the Supreme Court, as members of the board of pardons.</p> <p>3. A full pardon of an offense not only blots out the crime committed, but removes all punishment and disabilities resulting from the conviction. When extended to a convict in prison, it relieves him and removes his disabilities, and when granted after his time of imprisonment has expired, it removes all that is left of the consequences of conviction — his disabilities.</p> <p>4. By statute the conviction of the crime of larceny m the courts of thie State disqualifies the convict as a witness, and his pardon for this offense has the effect to restore his competency to testify as a witness.</p> <p>5. An act of the Legislature provided that a party who had been convicted of the crime of larceny should be restored to civil rights: Held, Without deciding whether a restoration to civil rights would include the restoration of competency as a witness, lost by reason of the conviction of the crime, that before the party could testify it must have such effect, and so construed, it was not competent for the Legislature to so enact.</p> <p>45. An accused is entitled to be tried by an impartial jury, and when it is made to appear to the trial judge that a fair and impartial trial can not be
Judges: Mabry
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
23 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- In Re Advisory Opinion of Governor Civil RightsSupreme Court of Florida· 1975-01-06· cited 69×
- Sullivan v. AskewSupreme Court of Florida· 1977-06-30· cited 56×
- United States v. Pasquale Matassini, A/K/A Pat Matassini, and Robert E. RodriguezFifth Circuit· 1978-01-10· cited 29×
- Marsh v. GarwoodSupreme Court of Florida· 1953-05-08· cited 29×
- In Re Advisory Opinion of the GovernorSupreme Court of Florida· 1976-06-23· cited 28×
- Jamison v. FlannerSupreme Court of Kansas· 1924-07-10· cited 25×
- Landrum v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1920-03-01· cited 22×
- Sandlin v. Criminal Justice Standards & Training CommissionSupreme Court of Florida· 1988-10-13· cited 22×
- Turner v. WainwrightDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1980-01-16· cited 15×
- Fields v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1956-02-22· cited 15×
- PAROLE COM'N v. LockettSupreme Court of Florida· 1993-04-22· cited 15×
- Randall v. Florida Dept. of Law EnforcementDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-08-21· cited 14×
- Hawkins v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1968-01-17· cited 12×
- Petition of Uriah John Taylor for Naturalization v. United StatesFifth Circuit· 1956-04-18· cited 11×
- R.J.L. v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2004-11-18· cited 11×
- Doe v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-02-28· cited 8×
- Sandlin v. CRIM. JUST. STANDARD & TR. COMM'NDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1987-08-11· cited 5×
- Crossley v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1976-05-28· cited 2×
- Singleton v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1897-06-15· cited 1×
- Englander v. Florida Real Estate CommissionDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1969-11-26· cited 1×
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Ex Parte GarlandSupreme Court· 1867-01-14· cited 795×
- United States v. WilsonSupreme Court· 1833-01-26· cited 235×
- Attorney General ex rel. Taylor v. BrownWisconsin Supreme Court· 1853-06-15· cited 41×
- People v. MooreMichigan Supreme Court· 1886-07-21· cited 31×
- Haley v. ClarkSupreme Court of Alabama· 1855-01-15· cited 28×
- State v. FoleyNevada Supreme Court· 1880-01-15· cited 22×
- People v. BowenCalifornia Supreme Court· 1872-04-15· cited 20×
- State v. NicholsSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1870-12-15· cited 19×
- Sterling v. DrakeOhio Supreme Court· 1876-12-15· cited 15×
- Ogletree v. DozierSupreme Court of Georgia· 1877-08-15· cited 14×
- In re the Executive Communication of the 23d of September, 1872Supreme Court of Florida· 1872-09-27· cited 11×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.