Singleton v. Collins

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting with approval that the lower court, in arriving at the amount of the fee, considered the evidence as to the time actually consumed, the services performed and the nature thereof in the light of Canon 12, Supreme Court Rule 33
• in attorney’s claim against client for professional services rendered, “no appeal lies therefrom if the findings of fact are supported by any competent evidence”
• “An attorney has a right to be paid for professional services rendered, and where there is no express contract, the law will imply one.”
• wherein action to recover attorney’s fees on theory of implied contract was at law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).