Singletary v. District of Columbia

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the district court erred in evaluating temporal proximity only on the basis of the “original protected activity” rather than protected activity years later (internal quotation marks omitted)
• holding that letters sent to deciding official regarding the status of an administrative proceeding constitute a protected activity
• holding that “a close temporal relationship may alone establish” the causal connection required to make a prima facie case of retaliation
• holding that “a close temporal relationship may alone establish the required causal connection” for retaliation claims
• holding that \a close temporal relationship may alone establish\ the causal connection required to make a prima facie case of retaliation
• holding that “a close temporal relationship may alone establish the required causal connection” for retaliation claims

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).