Skip to main content
· 3/1/2012

Singletary v. Department of Health & Human Services

Citations

  • 848 F. Supp. 2d 588
  • 2012 WL 993242
  • 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 41380

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • dismissing plaintiffs’ claim that defendant’s “all natural” representations were misleading because defendant’s ingredients were allegedly “unnatural,” where plaintiff failed to plausibly allege that the ingredients were in fact unnatural
  • discussing lack of a common understanding of the term “all natural” that is shared by reasonable consumers
  • dismissing claim that an “All Natural” label constituted a claim for negligent misrepresentation where the label was placed above an ingredients list that identified unnatural ingredients
  • observing in dismissing a challenge to “All Natural” pasta that “the reasonable consumer is aware that Buitoni Pastas are not springing fully-formed from Ravioli trees and Tortellini bushes”
  • dismissing consumer deception claims based on pasta’s label that stated “All Natural” reasoning “the reasonable consumer is aware that Buitoni Pastas are not springing fully-formed from Ravioli trees and Tortellini bushes” (internal quotation marks omitted
  • “Because of resource limitations and other agency priorities, FDA is not undertaking rulemaking to establish a definition for ‘natural’ at this time.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Boyle

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.