· 2/3/2006
Singhania v. Uttarwar
Citations
- 38 Cal. Rptr. 3d 861
- 136 Cal. App. 4th 416
- 2006 Daily Journal DAR 1478
- 2006 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1063
- 2006 Cal. App. LEXIS 141
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[I]n Steinberg, . . . the California Supreme Court . . . left open the question whether a nonstatutory exception to section 1312, subdivision (a), might exist for a damages action based upon misconduct of which a shareholder was unaware prior to consummation of a merger.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Elia
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.