Skip to main content
· 3/10/2009

Singh v. US Atty. Gen.

Citations

  • 561 F.3d 1275
  • 2009 WL 604370

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that ‘simply stating that an issue exists, without further argument or discussion, constitutes abandonment of that issue’
  • explaining that ‘simply stating that an issue exists, without further argument or discussion, constitutes abandonment of that issue’
  • explaining that ‘simply stating that an issue exists, without further argument or discussion, constitutes abandonment of that issue’
  • explaining that “simply stating that an issue exists, without further argument or discussion, constitutes abandonment of that issue”
  • explaining that ‘simply stating that an issue exists, without further argument or discussion, constitutes abandonment of that issue’
  • explaining that ‘simply stating that an issue exists, without further argument or discussion, constitutes abandonment of that issue’

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Birch, Hull and Anderson, Circuit Judges

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.