Singh v. United States House of Representatives, Committee on Ways & Means

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that claims that the plaintiff was assigned less favorable work, among other things, did not establish a hostile work environment
• holding that being treated differently, “spoken to in a condescending manner, although [] disrespectful and unfair,” did not give rise to “an illegal hostile work environment.”
• finding that statements about quality of plaintiffs work by individuals “who did not supervise ... or work closely enough” with her were insufficient to defeat summary judgment where plaintiffs supervisors held different view
• finding that a rocky working relationship, being kept from important meetings, being humiliated, and supervisor raising voice and being constantly hostile and hypercritical were ordinary tribulations of the workplace and not hostile work environment
• finding that statements about quality of plaintiff’s work by individuals “who did not supervise . . . or work closely enough” with her were insufficient to defeat summary judgment where plaintiff’s supervisors held different view
• involving supervisor telling the plaintiff “to shut up and sit down” during one-on-one meeting when the plaintiff asked to be excused

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).