Skip to main content
· 1/8/2006

Singh v. Still

Citations

  • 470 F. Supp. 2d 1064

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that the government’s claim of “[security] issues requiring further inquiry” was insufficient absent “further information”
  • “[Tjhere is a difference between the INS’s discretion over how to resolve an application and the INS’s discretion over whether it resolves an application.”
  • a “delay [in 23 processing immigration status applications] is less tolerable given that human health and welfare are at 24 stake”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Chen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.