Singh v. Gonzales

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “ICE merely asserts that it has followed up on its request for travel documents from 24 1 India and done all it can. . . . This is not sufficient evidence to rebut petitioner’s showing that he 2 is unlikely to be removed in the reasonably foreseeable future.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Zadvydas v. Davis
  Supreme Court· 2001-06-28· cited 3,847×
• Roy v. Ashcroft
  Fifth Circuit· 2004-10-20· cited 414×
• Adam Pelich v. Immigration and Naturalization Service Adele J. Fasano, District Director, for the San Diego District
  Ninth Circuit· 2003-05-22· cited 55×
• Shibeshi Lema v. U.S. Immigration and Naturalization Service John Ashcroft, Attorney General Robert S. Coleman, Jr.
  Ninth Circuit· 2003-09-02· cited 38×