SINGH
Citations
- 24 I. & N. Dec. 331
Syllabus
SINGH, 24 I&N Dec. 331 (BIA 2007) ID 3587 (PDF) There is no conflict between section 216(c)(4) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1186a(c)(4) (2000), and its implementing regulation at 8 C.F.R. § 1216.5(e)(1) (2007) where both provide the same start date for the circumstances to be considered in determining a conditional permanent resident's application for an extreme hardship waiver and only the statute provides an end date for the relevant period.
Cited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- KOLJENOVICBoard of Immigration Appeals· 2010-07-01· cited 36×
- Singh v. MukaseySecond Circuit· 2008-07-25· cited 23×
- ECHEVERRIABoard of Immigration Appeals· 2011-07-01· cited 10×
- MUNROEBoard of Immigration Appeals· 2014-07-01· cited 6×
- Orozco Becerra & Orozco BecerraBoard of Immigration Appeals· 2026-04-29
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Food & Drug Administration v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.Supreme Court· 2000-03-28· cited 1,963×
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. AbuduSupreme Court· 1988-03-01· cited 1,927×
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. DohertySupreme Court· 1992-01-15· cited 1,895×
- National Muffler Dealers Assn., Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1979-03-21· cited 544×
- COELHOBoard of Immigration Appeals· 1992-07-01· cited 405×
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Rios-PinedaSupreme Court· 1985-05-13· cited 366×
- Yadvender Singh v. U.S. Department of Justice, Attorney General Alberto GonzalesSecond Circuit· 2006-08-29· cited 30×
- Harry Carmichael and Louise Carmichael v. The Payment Center, Inc.Seventh Circuit· 2003-07-17· cited 21×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.