Sinert v. Olympia & York Development Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• refusing to extend Connecticut’s “unusual circumstances” exception to similar facts
• adding a caveat to the rule for “unusual circumstances”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Cooks v. O'Brien Properties, Inc.
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1998-04-07· cited 23×
• Munsill v. United States
  D. Rhode Island· 1998-09-03· cited 7×
• Johnson v. Pike
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2012-06-12· cited 3×
• Dominguez v. United States
  D. Connecticut· 2013-08-09· cited 3×
• Turmel v. Univ. of Vt.
  Vermont Superior Court· 2004-04-20
• Belevich v. Renaissance I, LLC.
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2021-08-31
• Sinert v. Olympia & York Development Co.
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1995-11-06
• Ocasio v. Verdura Construction, LLC
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2022-09-13

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Morin v. Bell Court Condominium Ass'n
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1992-08-04· cited 106×
• Kraus v. Newton
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1989-05-16· cited 70×
• Warren v. Stancliff
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1968-11-26· cited 37×
• Sheeler v. City of Waterbury
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1951-07-10· cited 28×
• Willametz v. Guida-Seibert Dairy Co.
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1968-12-17· cited 26×
• Snyder v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1958-09-11· cited 8×

Other cases named Sinert v. Olympia & York Development Co.

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

• Sinert v. Olympia & York Development Co.
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1995-11-06