Skip to main content
· 9/23/1996

Sindoni v. Consolidated Rail Corp.

Citations

  • 4 F. Supp. 2d 358
  • 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22043
  • 1996 WL 941820

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “The Second Circuit has held that the ADA has an additional requirement that is absent from the CFEPA definition.”
  • court found no duty where plaintiff relied on pleadings and briefs but presented no evidence in record to show that Conrail’s training him not to jump from train but to lie on floor during collision was negligent because it was not more detailed.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kosik

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.