Sinclair's Admr v. Illinois Central Railroad

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Plaintiff has no more than theories and opinions that Earhart’s plane, or parts of it, are depicted in the 2010 footage. Defendants disagree. As stated previously, [such] expressions of opinion are not [actionable] representations of fact....”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).