Sinclair v. Matter

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the title, “An act to provide for nonpartisan nominations for judicial offices” was insufficient and misleading as to the provision prohibiting partisan judicial nominations
• finding it unreasonable that a person would suspect that the “Legislature would solemnly enact a statute upon [a] subject which was already covered by another statute in precisely the same [manner]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).