Sinclair Pipe Line Co. v. Snyder

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• upholding Magistrate Judge’s finding of privilege when the Magistrate Judge had conducted an in camera review of the notes to reach that conclusion
• affirming 9 In this case, the two SEC attorneys who possess responsive interview notes5 have attested in sworn declarations that their notes: (i) are not verbatim transcriptions of what interviewees said; (ii
• work product protection was not overcome where defendants had the opportunity to examine witnesses at depositions and at trial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).