Sinclair Houston Federal Credit Union v. Hendricks

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the one who receives money, as opposed to other personalty, in good faith and for valuable consideration can keep it without liability to him from whom it was stolen
• stating that the property can be recovered from “anyone who has received it”
• stating that the one who receives money, as opposed to other personalty, in good faith and for valuable consideration can keep it without liability to him from whom it was stolen
• stating that the one who receives money, as opposed to other personalty , in good faith and for valuable consideration can keep it without liability to him from whom it was stolen
• stating that the one who receives money, as opposed to other personalty , in good faith and for valuable consideration can keep it without liability to him from whom it was stolen
• stating that the one who receives money, as opposed to other personalty , in good faith and for valuable consideration can keep it without liability to him from whom it was stolen

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).