Skip to main content
Ninth Circuit· 2/23/2009

Simson v. Burkart (In Re Simpson)

Citations

  • 557 F.3d 1010
  • 46 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1097
  • 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 3522
  • 2009 WL 426405

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reviewing for clear error whether the features of a retirement instrument “demonstrate that the product’s pri- mary purpose and effect [is] . . . a retirement plan” under CPC § 704.115

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: J. Clifford Wallace, Sidney R. Thomas, and Susan P. Graber, Circuit Judges

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.