· 2/23/2009
Simson v. Burkart (In Re Simpson)
Citations
- 557 F.3d 1010
- 46 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1097
- 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 3522
- 2009 WL 426405
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- reviewing for clear error whether the features of a retirement instrument “demonstrate that the product’s pri- mary purpose and effect [is] . . . a retirement plan” under CPC § 704.115
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: J. Clifford Wallace, Sidney R. Thomas, and Susan P. Graber, Circuit Judges
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.