Sims v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• mere statement that enhanced sentencing is necessary for protection of the public due to appellant’s continuing criminal activity not enough

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Cahill v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1986-06-11· cited 4×
• Davis v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1987-11-06· cited 3×
• Hugger v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1986-10-17· cited 1×
• Forrest v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-11-13· cited 1×
• Robinson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1988-02-03
• Johnson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1988-06-22

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Eutsey v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1980-04-24· cited 180×
• Walker v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1985-01-10· cited 64×
• Fleming v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1986-01-03· cited 11×
• Wright v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1985-10-11· cited 9×
• Cavallaro v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1982-10-22· cited 7×
• White v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1986-01-08· cited 6×
• Berry v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1986-03-05· cited 5×