Simpson v. State, Commercial Fisheries Entry Commission

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that “Johns . . . requires CFEC to meet the Act’s two legislative purposes of ‘enabling fishermen to receive adequate remuneration and conserving the fishery’ ” (quoting Johns, 758 P.2d at 1263)
• reaffirming that non-licensed fishers cannot receive past participation points
• reaffirming that non-licensed fishers cannot receive past participation points
• \We review questions of law ... de novo under the substitution of judgment standard.\
• argument waived because first raised in reply brief in superior court
• argument waived because first raised in reply brief in superior court

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).