Skip to main content
· 9/23/1994

Simpson v. Ernst & Young

Citations

  • 879 F. Supp. 802
  • 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19837
  • 1994 WL 763828

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • method by which benefits are cal- culated

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Steinberg

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.