Simpson v. Department of Fish & Wildlife

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• discussing the history of ORS 498.002(1)’s provision that “[w]ildlife is the property of the state”
• discussing the history of ORS 498.002(1)’s provision that “[w]ildlife is the property of the state”
• interpreting similar statute as “the state’s property interest in wildlife is sovereign, not proprietary” and that it follows that “the state’s property interest in wildlife under ORS 498.002(1

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).