Simpson v. Darwin Lee Stjernholm, D.C.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that when interpreting a state rule of procedure, appellate court may look to similar federal rule and related case law for guidance
• where juror responded \no\ when asked whether the verdict was hers, court violated CRE 606(b) in asking the juror why she had responded \no\
• where juror responded \no\ when asked whether the verdict was hers, court violated CRE 606(b) in asking the juror why she had responded \no\
• district court erred in asking juror to explain why the verdict was not her verdict and in allowing another juror to testify about what the dissenting juror said in the jury room
• district court erred in asking juror to explain why the verdiet was not her verdict and in allowing another juror to testify about what the dissenting juror said in the jury room

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).