Simpson v. Commonwealth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• missing audiotape not material portion of record for purposes of review
• substitute for missing record sufficient to allow appellate review
• substitute for missing record sufficient to allow appellate review
• showing of “prejudicial error” required

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Haight v. Commonwealth
  Kentucky Supreme Court· 1996-11-21· cited 48×
• Pate v. Commonwealth
  Kentucky Supreme Court· 2004-07-23· cited 46×
• State v. Williams
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1993-08-10· cited 41×
• People v. Banks
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2007-12-19· cited 27×
• Sandra Baker Waters v. Betty Kassulke, Warden, Kentucky Correctional Institution for Women
  Sixth Circuit· 1990-10-04· cited 23×
• Dishman v. Commonwealth
  Kentucky Supreme Court· 1995-09-21· cited 23×
• State v. Ladson
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2007-04-09· cited 16×
• Sevier v. Commonwealth
  Kentucky Supreme Court· 2014-06-19· cited 16×
• Matheny v. Commonwealth
  Kentucky Supreme Court· 2001-02-22· cited 10×
• Howell v. Commonwealth
  Kentucky Supreme Court· 2005-05-19· cited 9×
• Maschenik v. Goff
  Kentucky Supreme Court· 1992-05-14