Simpson v. Bouker

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that monetary penalties do not constitute affirmative disabilities or restraints
• addressing Kansas’s drug stamp tax in the context of a petition for writ of habeas corpus and holding that State v. Jensen, 915 P.2d 109 (Kan. 1996), which upheld the tax in light of Kurth Ranch, was also consistent with the analysis in Hudson
• upholding the Kansas drug tax in light of Kurth Ranch

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).