Simonetti v. Selective Ins. Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the inclusion of an anti-concurrent clause “evidence[ed] a clear intention to bar coverage”
• stating that ambiguity in an insurance contract “must be resolved against the insurer”
• noting that plaintiffs’ expert engineer attributed water intrusion to poor workmanship during house construction
• reversing summary judgment because factual question as to the cause of damages precluded application of a policy exclusion
• finding factual question existed as to whether rainstorm caused some or all of damage to plaintiffs' home and stating that issues of causation are for jury to resolve
• finding factual question existed as to whether rainstorm caused some or all of damage to plaintiffs' home and stating that issues of causation are for jury to resolve

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).