Skip to main content
· 2/18/1886

Simonds v. Haithcock

Citations

  • 24 S.C. 207
  • 1886 S.C. LEXIS 25

Syllabus

<p>1. The Circuit Judge committed no error in confirming a return of homestead appraisers, to which exceptions, supported by affidavits, were filed, alleging excessive valuation, but not mistake, fraud, or corruption.</p> <p>2. The return of homestead appraisers should have the same force and effect as the return of commissioners in dower, as to which latter the principle was declared in Irvine v. Brooks, 19 S. C., 101.</p> <p>3. The statute (Gen. Stai., $ 1996) regulating the assignment of a homestead to a debtor where his lands exceed SI,000 in value and cannot be divided, is not unconstitutional.</p>

Judges: McGowan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.