Simon v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins., 2010-1613 (La. 10/29/10)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• When a juvenile court asserts jurisdiction based on potential harm to the child, the proof of the projected harm should be by qualified experts and not a mere conclusion
• When a juvenile court asserts jurisdiction based on potential harm to the child, the proof of the projected harm should be by qualified experts and not a mere conclusion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).