Simon v. Richard

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming the ALJ’s finding that Listing 1.04 criteria were not met because “Plaintiff’s motor strength was consistently normal with no evidence of atrophy, as were her sensation and deep-tendon reflexes”
• affirming the ALJ’s finding that Listing 1.04 criteria were not met because “Plaintiff’s motor strength was consistently normal with no evidence of atrophy, as were her sensation and deep-tendon reflexes.”
• affirming the ALJ’s finding that Listing 1.04 criteria were not met 16 because “Plaintiff's motor strength was consistently normal with no evidence of atrophy, as were her sensation and deep-tendon reflexes”
• \It is an appropriate exercise of discretion for an ALJ to afford little weight to a medical opinion that is internally inconsistent.\
• “It is an appropriate exercise of discretion for an ALJ to afford little weight to a medical opinion that is internally inconsistent.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).