Skip to main content
· 9/20/2012

Simon v. Keyspan Corporation

Citations

  • 694 F.3d 196
  • 2012 WL 4125845
  • 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 19815

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding FERC tightly controlled the rate-making process because it established the process, reviewed the rates, and used its investigative powers
  • barring claims against Morgan Stanley for facilitating anticompetitive conduct under the filed rate doctrine
  • “Generally, only direct purchasers have standing to bring civil antitrust claims.” (citing Illinois Brick, 420 U.S. 720)
  • “In reviewing a motion to dismiss, we . . . draw all reasonable inferences in the plaintiff’s favor.”
  • \[I]t is nearly impossible for a court to determine which portion of an overcharge is actually borne by the direct purchaser and which portion is borne by a subsequent indirect purchaser.\
  • the rule bars “fraud or deceit in connection with the sale of energy”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Walker, Lynch, Droney

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.