Simon v. Drake

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that “expert testimony by a medical professional is normally required to establish causation and the standard of care” in medical malpractice cases
• stating that “[i]n a civil case, the admission or exclusion of evidence is not reversible error unless it unfairly prejudiced a substantial right of the complaining party”
• certain testimony prejudicial and not harmless; no curative instruction given

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).