Simmons v. Sykes Enterprises, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that “the underlying Appellate Case: 21-4093 Document: 010110744428 Date Filed: 09/26/2022 Page: 23 principles of agency” discussed in Staub “apply equally” to claims under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (ADEA
• recognizing that a supervisor’s animus can be a but-for cause of termina- tion where the “supervisor falsely reports” a violation, which leads to an 21 See Dkt. 36-1 at 4 (indicating Mr. Brooks created a Grindr account to “extort” Gerardo Lopez
• distinguishing ADEA requirement that plaintiff show age was the “but-for” cause of adverse employment action from Title Vil and USERRA’s “motivating factor” tests
• discussing application of Staub to ADEA

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).