Simmons v. Stanberry

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• plaintiff claimed to be exclusive licensee of copyright interest in a beat and thus the “effective[] . . . owner[] over the rights licensed”
• copyright infringement claim was time-barred when “more than three years prior to [plaintiff's] filing of his suit, [defendant] had made clear to [plaintiff] that he rejected [plaintiffs] assertion of an interest in the copyright”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).