Simmons v. Rosenberg

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “[d]iversity must be alleged with detail and certainty,” and that merely averring that a party is a citizen of a state other than New York is insufficient
• merely averring that a party is a citizen of a state other than the State of New York is “clearly insufficient to establish diversity Jurisdiction”
• merely averring that a party is a citizen of a state other than New York is clearly insufficient to establish diversity jurisdiction
• merely averring that a party is a citizen of a state other than New York is clearly insufficient to establish diversity jurisdiction
• “merely averring that [a party] [is] … ‘a citizen of a state other than New York’” held insufficient to establish diversity jurisdiction
• merely averring that a party is a citizen of a state other than the State of New York is “clearly insufficient to establish diversity Jurisdiction”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).