Simmons v. PCR TECHNOLOGY

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting plaintiff’s argument that attorneys’ fees are limited to those accrued at time of 19 removal
• considering emotional distress damages, punitive damages, and attorneys’ fees in determining the amount in controversy in FEHA case
• “The fact that the cited cases 4 involved distinguishable facts is not dispositive...[because] the jury verdicts in [the cited] cases 5 amply demonstrate the potential for large punitive damage awards in employment discrimination 6 cases.”
• “[T]he court may examine facts in the complaint.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).