Simmons' v. Hunt

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that motions in limine “are ‘designed to narrow the evidentiary issues for trial and to eliminate unnecessary trial interruptions.’”
• motions in limine “are ‘designed to narrow the evidentiary issues for trial and to eliminate unnecessary trial interruptions.’” (internal quotation omitted)
• motions in limine “are ‘designed to narrow the evidentiary issues for trial and to eliminate unnecessary trial interruptions.’” (internal quotation omitted)
• motions in limine “are ‘designed to narrow the evidentiary issues for trial and to eliminate unnecessary trial interruptions.’” (internal quotation omitted)
• motions in limine “are ‘designed to narrow the evidentiary issues for trial and to eliminate unnecessary trial interruptions’” (internal quotation omitted)
• “[Motions in limine] are ‘designed to narrow the evidentiary issues for trial and to eliminate unnecessary trial interruptions.’” (quoting Louzon v. Ford Motor Co., 718 F.3d 556, 561 (6th Cir. 2013))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).