Skip to main content
· 1/5/2011

Simmons v. District of Columbia

Citations

  • 750 F. Supp. 2d 43
  • 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 795
  • 2011 WL 20418

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a plaintiff “may bring an action against unknown John Doe defendants, but plaintiff must substitute named defendants for those unknown defendants afier the completion of discovery”
  • “Plaintiff may bring an action against unknown John Doe defendants, but plaintiff must substitute named defendants for those unknown defendants after the completion of discovery.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Royce C. Lamberth

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.