Simmons v. Chuck's, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding remand for purposes of transfer was necessary because PUC had primary jurisdiction over county's claim against telephone service provider, and trial court erred under Section 5103(a
• stating that matters related to public utility tariffs are peculiarly within the expertise of the PUC and, as such, are outside the original jurisdiction of the courts
• upholding trial court finding that PUC had primary jurisdiction over claim that Verizon incorrectly billed, collected, and remitted the 911 contribution rate to Erie County

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).