Skip to main content
· 9/14/2001

Simmons v. Allstate Insurance

Citations

  • 112 Cal. Rptr. 2d 397
  • 92 Cal. App. 4th 1068
  • 2001 Daily Journal DAR 10965
  • 2001 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8845
  • 2001 Cal. App. LEXIS 801

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “a SLAPP motion, like a summary judgment motion, pierces the pleadings and requires an evidentiary showing”
  • so holding under California’s anti-SLAPP statute contemporaneous with Oregon’s enactment
  • “Allowing 21 a SLAPP plaintiff leave to amend the complaint once the court finds the prima facie showing has 22 been met [by defendant] would completely undermine the statute by providing the pleader a ready 23 escape from section 425.16’s quick dismissal remedy.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Callahan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.