· 9/14/2001
Simmons v. Allstate Insurance
Citations
- 112 Cal. Rptr. 2d 397
- 92 Cal. App. 4th 1068
- 2001 Daily Journal DAR 10965
- 2001 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8845
- 2001 Cal. App. LEXIS 801
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “a SLAPP motion, like a summary judgment motion, pierces the pleadings and requires an evidentiary showing”
- so holding under California’s anti-SLAPP statute contemporaneous with Oregon’s enactment
- “Allowing 21 a SLAPP plaintiff leave to amend the complaint once the court finds the prima facie showing has 22 been met [by defendant] would completely undermine the statute by providing the pleader a ready 23 escape from section 425.16’s quick dismissal remedy.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Callahan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.